THIS BLOG HAS MOVED TO resistancenews.org

dimanche 29 novembre 2015

Iran's Leader Khamenei Letter to the Western Youth: Who created terrorist ISIS & Al-Qaeda?

Today terrorism is our common worry; Second Letter to the Western Youth by Sayyed Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, on November 29, 2015

Transcript: 
 
In the Name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful

To the Youth in Western Countries,

The bitter events brought about by blind terrorism in France have once again, moved me to speak to you young people.  For me, it is unfortunate that such incidents would have to create the framework for a conversation, however the truth is that if painful matters do not create the grounds for finding solutions and mutual consultation, then the damage caused will be multiplied.
Anyone who has benefited from affection and humanity is affected and disturbed by witnessing these scenes- whether it occurs in France or in Palestine or Iraq or Lebanon or Syria. 
The pain of any human being anywhere in the world causes sorrow for a fellow human being.  The sight of a child losing his life in the presence of his loved ones, a mother whose joy for her family turns into mourning, a husband who is rushing the lifeless body of his spouse to some place and the spectator who does not know whether he will be seeing the final scene of life- these are scenes that rouse the emotions and feelings of any human being.  Anyone who has benefited from affection and humanity is affected and disturbed by witnessing these scenes- whether it occurs in France or in Palestine or Iraq or Lebanon or Syria. 

Without a doubt, the one-and-a-half billion Muslims also have these feelings and abhor and are revolted by the perpetrators and those responsible for these calamities. The issue, however, is that if today’s pain is not used to build a better and safer future, then it will just turn into bitter and fruitless memories. I genuinely believe that it is only you the youth who by learning the lessons of today’s hardship, have the power to discover new means for building the future and who can be barriers in the misguided path that has brought the west to its current impasse.

It is correct that today terrorism is our common worry.  However, it is necessary for you to know that the insecurity and strain that you experienced during the recent events, differ from the pain that the people of Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Afghanistan have been experiencing for many years, in two significant ways.  First, the Islamic world has been the victim of terror and brutality to a larger extent territorially, to greater amount quantitatively and for a longer period in terms of time. Second, that unfortunately this violence has been supported by certain great powers through various methods and effective means. 

Today, there are very few people who are uninformed about the role of the United States of America in creating, nurturing and arming al-Qaeda, the Taliban and their inauspicious successors.  Besides this direct support, the overt and well-known supporters of takfiri terrorism- despite having the most backward political systems- are standing arrayed as allies of the west while the most pioneering, brightest and most dynamic democrats in the region are suppressed mercilessly. The prejudiced response of the west to the awakening movement in the Islamic world is an illustrative example of the contradictory western policies.

I genuinely believe that it is only you the youth who by learning the lessons of today’s hardship can be barriers in the misguided path that has brought the west to its current impasse.  

The other side of these contradictory policies is seen in supporting the state terrorism of Israel.  The oppressed people of Palestine have experienced the worst kind of terrorism for the last sixty years.  If the people of Europe have now taken refuge in their homes for a few days and refrain from being present in busy places- it is decades that a Palestinian family is not secure even in its own home from the Zionist regime’s death and destruction machinery. What kind of atrocious violence today is comparable to that of the settlement constructions of the Zionist regime?

This regime- without ever being seriously and significantly censured by its influential allies or even by the so-called independent international organizations- everyday demolishes the homes of Palestinians and destroys their orchards and farms.  This is done without even giving them time to gather their belongings or agricultural products and usually it is done in front of the terrified and tear-filled eyes of women and children who witness the brutal beatings of their family members who in some cases are being dragged away to gruesome torture chambers.  In today’s world, do we know of any other violence on this scale and scope and for such an extended period of time?

Shooting down a woman in the middle of the street for the crime of protesting against a soldier who is armed to the teeth- if this is not terrorism, what is? This barbarism, because it is being done by the armed forces of an occupying government, should not be called extremism? Or maybe only because these scenes have been seen repeatedly on television screens for sixty years, they should no longer stir our consciences.
Dear youth! I have the hope that you- now or in the future- can change this mentality corrupted by duplicity, a mentality whose highest skill is hiding long-term goals and adorning malevolent objectives.
The military invasions of the Islamic world in recent years- with countless victims- are another example of the contradictory logic of the west. The assaulted countries, in addition to the human damage caused, have lost their economic and industrial infrastructure, their movement towards growth and development has been stopped or delayed and in some cases, has been thrown back decades.  Despite all this, they are rudely being asked not to see themselves as oppressed.  How can a country be turned into ruins, have its cities and towns covered in dust and then be told that it should please not view itself as oppressed? Instead of enticements to not understand and to not mention disasters, would not an honest apology be better?  The pain that the Islamic world has suffered in these years from the hypocrisy and duplicity of the invaders is not less than the pain from the material damage.

Dear youth! I have the hope that you- now or in the future- can change this mentality corrupted by duplicity, a mentality whose highest skill is hiding long-term goals and adorning malevolent objectives.  In my opinion, the first step in creating security and peace is reforming this violence-breeding mentality.  As long as double-standards dominate western policies, as long as terrorism- in the view of its powerful supporters- is divided into “good” and “bad” types, and as long as governmental interests are given precedence over human values and ethics, the roots of violence should not be searched for in other places.
  I consider the imposition of western culture upon other peoples and the trivialization of independent cultures as a form of silent violence and extreme harmfulness. 
Unfortunately, these roots have taken hold in the depths of western cultural policies over the course of many years and they have caused a soft and silent invasion.  Many countries of the world take pride in their local and national cultures, cultures which through development and regeneration have soundly nurtured human societies for centuries.  The Islamic world is not an exception to this.  However in the current era, the western world with the use of advanced tools is insisting on the cloning and replication of its culture on a global scale.  I consider the imposition of western culture upon other peoples and the trivialization of independent cultures as a form of silent violence and extreme harmfulness. 

Humiliating rich cultures and insulting the most honored parts of these, is occurring while the alternative culture being offered in no way has any qualification for being a replacement.  For example, the two elements of “aggression” and “moral promiscuity” which unfortunately have become the main elements of western culture, have even degraded the position and acceptability of its source region.      

So now the question is: are we “sinners” for not wanting an aggressive, vulgar and fatuous culture? Are we to be blamed for blocking the flood of impropriety that is directed towards our youth in the shape of various forms of quasi-art?  I do not deny the importance and value of cultural interaction.  Whenever these interactions are conducted in natural circumstances and with respect for the receiving culture, they result in growth, development and richness.  On the contrary, inharmonious interactions have been unsuccessful and harmful impositions.

We have to state with full regret that vile groups such as DAESH are the spawn of such ill-fated pairings with imported cultures.  If the matter was simply theological, we would have had to witness such phenomena before the colonialist era, yet history shows the contrary.  Authoritative historical records clearly show how colonialist confluence of extremist and rejected thoughts in the heart of a Bedouin tribe, planted the seed of extremism in this region.  How then is it possible that such garbage as DAESH comes out of one of the most ethical and humane religious schools which as part of its inner core, includes the notion that taking the life of one human being is equivalent to killing the whole of humanity?

One has to ask why people who are born in Europe and who have been intellectually and mentally nurtured in that environment are attracted to such groups?  Can we really believe that people with only one or two trips to war zones, suddenly become so extreme that they can riddle the bodies of their compatriots with bullets?  On this matter, we certainly cannot forget about the effects of a life nurtured in a pathologic culture in a corrupt environment borne out of violence.  On this matter, we need complete analyses, analyses that see the hidden and apparent corruptions.  Maybe a deep hate- planted in the years of economic and industrial growth and borne out of inequality and possibly legal and structural prejudice- created ideas that every few years appear in a sickening manner. 
Any rushed and emotional reaction which would isolate, intimidate and create more anxiety for the Muslim communities living in Europe and America not only will not solve the problem but will increase the chasms and resentments.
In any case, you are the ones that have to uncover the apparent layers of your own society and untie and disentangle the knots and resentments. Fissures have to be sealed, not deepened. Hasty reactions are a major mistake when fighting terrorism which only widens the chasms. Any rushed and emotional reaction which would isolate, intimidate and create more anxiety for the Muslim communities living in Europe and America- which are comprised of millions of active and responsible human beings- and which would deprive them of their basic rights more than has already happened and which would drive them away from society- not only will not solve the problem but will increase the chasms and resentments.

Superficial measures and reactions, especially if they take legal forms, will do nothing but increase the current polarizations, open the way for future crises and will result in nothing else.   According to reports received, some countries in Europe have issued guidelines encouraging citizens to spy on Muslims.  This behavior is unjust and we all know that pursuing injustice has the characteristic of unwanted reversibility.  Besides, the Muslims do not deserve such ill-treatment.  For centuries, the western world has known Muslims well- the day that westerners were guests in Islamic lands and were attracted to the riches of their hosts and on another day when they were hosts and benefitted from the efforts and thoughts of Muslims- they generally experienced nothing but kindness and forbearance.

Therefore I want you the youth to lay the foundations for a correct and honorable interaction with the Islamic world based on correct understanding, deep insight and lessons learned from horrible experiences.  In such a case and in the not too distant future, you will witness the edifice built on these firm foundations which creates a shade of confidence and trust which cools the crown of its architect, a warmth of security and peace that it bequests on them and a blaze of hope in a bright future which illuminates the canvass of the earth.

Sayyid Ali Khamenei

8th of Azar, 1394 - 29th of Nov, 2015

Read Ayatollah Khamenei's first letter to the youth in the west here. 

samedi 14 novembre 2015

Terrorist attacks in Paris: after the emotion, let us denounce ALL the guilty




Translated from French by Jenny Bright 

Condolences and solidarity with all victims of terrorist barbarism, whatever their nationality (a life is a life, even if we naturally feel closer to our fellow citizens), whatever its face, for 13 years (invasion of Iraq) and even longer and not only since the 13th of November: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Palestine, Libya, Nigeria, etc., etc., up to Beirut and Paris, the innocent dead count in the hundreds of thousands and even millions.

Condemnation of all terrorists, all their allies, all their supporters, particularly governments, against which a “merciless” justice needs indeed to be exercised (without forgetting their apologist media): USA, UK, Israel, France, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar... Let us recall that Laurent Fabius said about Al-Nosra, a branch of Al Qaeda, that they “do a good job in Syria”, and that François Hollande acknowledged arming the “moderate cutthroats” of the anti-Assad opposition. These attacks are the direct, predictable and long-foreseen consequence of their irresponsible, criminal and stateless policy which has followed the footsteps of Nicolas Sarkozy in Libya.

Reject of any confusion: these attacks are not the result of Islam or even of “Islamism” but of Wahhabism, a fanatical and heretical doctrine, that the Islamic world ostracized and imprisoned the precursor of, Ibn Taymiyya, but which the West installed in Saudi Arabia to control the Middle East and its resources, permitting it to root deeply and be exported. Muslims constitute more than 90% of the victims of this destructive ideology, which the “democratist” and “republicanist” bombs of the US have opened the way for since 2003.

Support to the states authentically fighting the terrorism of Daesh and others: the Syrian Arab Army, Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, Iraqi forces, Yemeni army and resistance, Palestinian resistance, etc., whom it is appropriate to honour, as they fight for their liberty and their security but also for our own.

Necessary reminder, unfortunately, in our post-9th January France which can only become more schizophrenic and liberticidal: “Je ne suis pas Charlie” (I am not Charlie).

Sayed Hasan (Paris)




 Don't get cross buddy Hollande, it's only “friendly fire”.




Bachar al-Assad about the terrorist attacks in Paris

Interview with Bashar al-Assad, President of the Syrian Arab Republic, on November 14, 2015.

Transcript: 

Damascus, SANA – President Bashar al-Assad received on Saturday a French delegation, including a number of parliamentarians, intellectuals, and media men, headed by member of the French National Assembly Thierry Mariani.

President al-Assad affirmed that the terrorist attacks which targeted Paris couldn’t be separated from those that took place in Beirut, and what has been happening in Syria since 5 years and in other regions, adding “terrorism is one field in the world and terrorist organizations don’t recognize borders.”

“Wrong polices adopted by western states, particularly France, towards events in the region, and its ignorance of the support of a number of its allies to terrorists are reasons behind the expansion of terrorism,” President al-Assad said, pointing out to the importance of adopting new polices and taking active procedures to stop support for terrorists logistically or politically in order to overcome terrorism.

For their part, members of the visiting delegation underlined that the terrorist attacks in France yesterday proved that there is no state which would be safe from terrorism, expressing belief in the importance of unifying efforts of regional and international sides to combat it and stop this phenomenon which poses threat to the peoples of the region and world.

They showed sympathy with the suffering of the Syrian people who are subjected to a fierce terrorist war, affirming their determination to convey what they have really seen during their visit to Syria in a way that could form a French public opinion, based on realities, not on fabricated images.

In statements to the journalists following the meeting, President al-Assad said, in response to a question about his reaction on what happened in Paris on Friday “First of all, we offer our condolences to the French families that lost dear members yesterday, and we are the closest people to this situation to understand what happened yesterday in France, because we have been suffering from this kind of terrorism for the last five years in Syria.

“And what happened in France yesterday cannot be separated from what happened in Beirut two days ago, because this is terrorism. That’s why you shouldn’t look at terrorism as separate arenas, like looking at Syria’s arena, Yemen, Libya, France. Actually, it’s one arena all around the world.”
 
Asked about where the Syrian intelligence services have any indication or information that either the people who committed this act came from Syria or were in contact with any group in Syria, the President said “No, we don’t have any information about what happened, but it’s not about the names, and who went and who didn’t. We warned about what’s going to happen in Europe three years ago, and we said don’t mess with the fault line in Syria. It’s going to be like an earthquake that will reverberate around the world, and unfortunately the European officials didn’t pay attention to what we said. They thought that we are threatening, and they didn’t learn from what happened at the beginning of this year, from Charlie Hebdo.”

He added “Just giving statements that you are against terrorism means nothing. You have to go and fight terrorism, you have to pursue the correct and right policies, that’s what they have to do.”
In his response to a question whether Syria is ready to fight with France against terrorism if they ask and help the French intelligence services, President Assad said “They don’t have to ask; they only have to be serious. This is where we are ready to fight terrorism with them.”

“We are ready to fight terrorism with whoever wants to really fight terrorism, and the French government is not serious yet,” he added.
In a message he was asked to send to the French President Francois Hollande, President al-Assad said “Work for the sake and the interest of your people. And the question that any Frenchman would ask today: did the French policy during the last five years do any good to the French people? Actually, no. So, the first thing I’ll ask is to work for the interest of the French people, and if he wants to do that, he has to change his policy.”

Asked about the condition for the Syrian government and the French government to work together, or for the Syrian intelligence services to work with the French intelligence services, President Assad said “You cannot talk about intelligence cooperation without political cooperation. You cannot talk about intelligence cooperation in order to fight terrorism while at the same time your policies, the policies of the same government, are going in the direction of supporting terrorism. That’s what I meant by being serious.”

dimanche 8 novembre 2015

Colonialism, clientelism and censorship: the dark side of the French Secular Mission (MISR LANGUAGE School)

The French Secular Mission threatens Google and a former employee to take them to the “repressive jurisdiction”

[Update: the MLF is suing me for libel at a special hearing, an emergency procedure meant to issue an injunction requiring TOTALremoval of my articles and more than 10,000 eurosin damages. I have to find a lawyer againand present my whole case in drastic times, and if I am condemned, it could mean prisonbecause I do not have that kind of money. The MLF being somewhat the French Ministry of Foreign Affair's wing, this is nothing but an attempt of State Censorhip. As soon as I can, I will continue the story of the events.]



Translated from French by Jenny Bright

Formal notices from the MLF sent to Google and myself are annexed.

On 19 September 2015, I published the first part of an article entitled “The French Secular Mafia’s Carpetbaggers”, where I give a detailed account of a case that has opposed me to the French Secular Mission (or French Lay Mission – MLF) since 2013, and for which I took them to the Labour Court of Paris. I denounced the mafia methods of this unscrupulous institution more greedy for gain than a dispenser of any kind of instruction or education worthy of the name.

Anxious to maintain its ethereal and false reputation, the French Secular Mission today intimidates Internet hosts and threatens me with retaliatory measures in an attempt to censor any publication of the case. An excellent reason to recall the facts and outdo them by digging deeper into the history, role and authentic values ​​of the French Secular Mission while awaiting the follow-up of the story and events.  


dimanche 25 octobre 2015

Vladimir Poutine en Syrie : Guerre et paix, revisité



Par Pepe Escobar – Le 23 octobre 2015 – Source Asia Times


Image en ligne

Et bien entendu, il a cité Tolstoï.

Le président russe Vladimir Poutine a encore fait flèche de tout bois lors de la XIIe édition du club de discussion de Valdaï à Sotchi, en faisant ressortir toute la gravité de la réalité géopolitique actuelle.

Image en ligne
Poutine à Valdaï

Au rayon CD des plus grands tubes de la politique étrangère et de la stratégie militaire comparées, l’allocution se qualifie déjà partout comme lecture obligée des cours de sciences politiques. Le discours au complet de Poutine, suivi d’une série de questions et réponses cruciales, se trouve ici. La vidéo du discours est là.

Passons tout de suite à quelques faits saillants incontournables.

À propos des rebelles modérés en Syrie :

« Nous ne devrions pas jouer avec les mots et diviser les terroristes entre modérés et non modérés (…). La différence, selon les spécialistes [l’équipe Obama], c’est que les bandits modérés décapitent les gens avec douceur (…). On ne peut vaincre les terroristes si on utilise certains d’entre eux comme bélier pour renverser des régimes qui déplaisent, (car) il est illusoire de croire qu’on pourra en venir à bout (plus tard), les chasser du pouvoir et négocier avec eux d’une façon ou d’une autre. »

À propos de la partition de la Syrie :

« La division territoriale de la Syrie est inacceptable. Cela ne réglera pas le conflit. Le conflit va revêtir un caractère permanent. Rien de bon n’en sortira. (…) Imaginez un instant qu’en prenant Damas ou Bagdad, les groupes terroristes obtiendraient pratiquement le statut de gouvernement officiel. Une tête de pont pour une expansion mondiale serait ainsi créée. A-t-on réfléchi à cela ? »

À propos de la campagne aérienne de la Russie en Syrie :

« Je tiens à souligner de nouveau qu’elle est tout à fait légitime et que son seul objectif est de contribuer à établir la paix. »

Poutine fait une distinction claire entre l’objectif de Washington (Assad doit partir) et l’objectif de Moscou, qui est de combattre le terrorisme salafo-djihadiste sous toutes ses formes avant qu’il n’atteigne la Russie.

À propos du dossier nucléaire iranien :

« L’hypothétique menace nucléaire de l’Iran n’est qu’un mythe. Les USA ont tenté de détruire l’équilibre stratégique pour mieux assurer leur domination et dicter leur volonté à tous, y compris à leurs adversaires géopolitiques et à leurs alliés. »

À propos des armes nucléaires :

« Nous étions en droit de nous attendre à ce que les travaux d’élaboration du système de défense antimissile des États-Unis cessent. Mais ce n’est pas le cas et les travaux se poursuivent. C’est un scénario très dangereux et nuisible pour tous, y compris pour les États-Unis. La dissuasion nucléaire a commencé à perdre de sa valeur, et certains se bercent même de l’illusion qu’une grande victoire de l’une des parties est possible dans un conflit mondial, et ce, sans conséquences irréversibles pour le gagnant, s’il devait y en avoir un. »

Dans un monde idéal, ce discours serait accueilli comme un bel exemple de realpolitik. Sauf que nous vivons dans l’ombre de l’Empire du Chaos, un monde où dominent la novlangue [orwellienne] et les hauts cris hystériques des néocons et néolibérauxcons.

Image en ligne
Obama et Georges Orwell

Un monde où l’Irak avait des armes de destruction massive, où l’Iran fabriquait une bombe nucléaire, où les listes de personnes à abattre [de manière extrajudiciaire] sont légitimes, où Al-Qaïda en Syrie est composé de rebelles modérés, où la Russie, la Chine et l’Iran constituent pour le Pentagone des menaces pires que EIIS / EIIL / Da’ech, où le Pentagone croit qu’il peut remporter une guerre contre ces menaces (Russie, Chine et Iran) sans subir de conséquences. Un monde où la guerre, c’est la paix.

Ces chers penseurs saoudiens…

Examinons maintenant la réalité sur le terrain. Il serait illusoire d’espérer que Washington, Ankara, Riyad et Doha laissent tout simplement tomber la Syrie après toutes ces années passées à soutenir, former et armer la galaxie salafo-djihadiste pour obtenir un changement de régime. Poutine et le Kremlin savent aussi que ces protagonistes ne peuvent plus livrer directement des armes aux rebelles modérés, parce que leurs intentions sont dorénavant exposées au vu et au su de l’opinion publique mondiale.

Ils ne peuvent plus les armer ? Ça reste à voir…

Sur le terrain, le long de la ligne Sykes-Picot en ruines en Syrak, ce qui se passe maintenant met essentiellement aux prises les 4+1 (Russie, Iran, Syrie, Irak et Hezbollah), qui ont formé un centre de renseignements conjoint à Bagdad, et le tandem Otan-CCG (Turquie, Arabie saoudite et Qatar). Une guerre par procuration complexe est en cours et déclenche dans son sillage son lot d’alertes rouges.

Des problèmes, des problèmes partout. Commençons par ces larbins du Conseil de coopération du Golfe (CCG). La maison des Saoud est en pleine crise d’apoplexie, provoquée par la résurgence politique, diplomatique et commerciale imminente de l’Iran, sans oublier les gains qu’engrange Téhéran sur les fronts syrien et irakien.

Parallèlement, ces fanatiques barbares qui se font passer pour des imams en Arabie saoudite appellent au djihad contre… la Russie. Les penseurs (?) saoudiens souhaitent que Riyad dirige une coalition contre les vestiges de l’Armée arabe syrienne, le Hezbollah et les conseillers iraniens afin d’accélérer le changement de régime à Damas.

Il convient de se rappeler que les Saoudiens font déjà partie de ce que j’appelle la Coalition des opportunistes tordus (COT), que Washington dirige de l’arrière. Ce qu’omettent de dire ces penseurs saoudiens, c’est que leur nouvelle coalition serait directement confrontée à l’armée de l’air russe.

Mais le degré absolu de la bêtise pathétique a été atteint lorsque le Qatar a appelé à une intervention militaire directe en Syrie. Le ministre des Affaires étrangères du Qatar, Khalid al-Attiyah, a dit ceci à CNN : « Nous n’épargnerons aucun effort, quel qu’il soit, avec nos frères saoudiens et turcs pour mettre en œuvre tout ce qui protège le peuple syrien et la Syrie d’une partition. »

Image en ligne
Un avion russe en Syrie

Devant un tel niveau de démence géopolitique, il ne reste plus qu’à citer un autre joueur dément, l’instigateur de djihad Bandar Bush (il a déjà menacé Poutine en personne, rien de moins !) qui avait dépeint le Qatar (avec raison) comme 300 personnes et une chaîne de télévision. Laissons aux penseurs du CCG le soin d’imaginer les F-16 saoudiens et qataris bombardant les forces armées iraniennes juste à côté de la base aérienne russe à Lattaquié, et leur réduction en poussière par quelques soukhoïs… et quoi encore ? La déclaration de la Troisième Guerre mondiale par le Pentagone ?

Couronnons le tout par un sketch à la Monty Python, où l’on voit le roi (sénile) Salmane d’Arabie saoudite et le mini-émir du Qatar délibérer, entourés de bouteilles de whisky et de cognac et de danseuses lascives, sur la possibilité d’entrer en guerre contre la Russie et l’Iran uniquement pour permettre à al-Qaïda en Syrie de préparer un changement de régime à Damas.

Il est toujours éclairant de garder à l’esprit ces mots de l’écrivain tunisien Hamadi Redissi : « Les thèses de l’Islam millénariste, misanthrope, indompté, belliqueux, antichrétien, antisémite et misogyne se trouvent à l’état brut dans le wahhabisme », ou encore ceux de l’écrivain algérien Boualem Sansal : « Le monde arabe de papa (…) sera fini lorsque tombera le dernier dictateur et que sera brisé ce machin absurde, l’Arabie saoudite, club de faux princes arrogants et cruels, qui se pose en gardien de la mythique race arabe et du véritable Islam. »

La situation n’est guère plus brillante à la cour du Grand Turc salafiste en complet bleu, le Sultan Erdogan.

Si jamais il y avait une véritable coordination entre Moscou et Washington (appuyons fort sur le si) pour sceller la frontière entre la Syrie et la Turquie, où une zone d’exclusion aérienne de facto sous le contrôle de la Russie existe déjà, cela couperait non seulement les voies d’approvisionnement de EIIS / EIIL / Da’ech, mais aussi celles des rebelles modérés d’al-CIAda.

Trois conséquences en découleraient aussitôt : 1) pas de zone protégée au nord de la Syrie établie par des brigades turkmènes (c’est déjà chose faite) ; 2) aucune possibilité d’annexion d’Alep par Ankara ; 3) abandon de tous les plans soigneusement préparés en vue de la construction de cet infâme gazoduc s’étendant du Qatar à la Turquie en passant par la Syrie pour approvisionner les clients européens, une des clés de voûte dans l’origine de la tragédie syrienne.

Image en ligne
Le présomptueux sultan Erdogan ne s’en remettrait jamais.


La paix est-elle encore la guerre ?

Au moment même où Bagdad fait des progrès dans sa lutte contre EIIS / EIIL / Da’ech – progrès passés sous silence dans les médias institutionnels occidentaux embarrassés au point de vouloir se faire oublier –, Moscou continue de faire pression pour que prime la voix de la raison.

Image en ligneAssad et Poutine au Kremlin

L’apparition spectaculaire de Bachar al-Assad à Moscou – qui a rendu les néocons et les néolibérauxcons fous furieux – incluait même un dîner au plus haut niveau avec Poutine, Medvedev, Lavrov et Choïgou. L’illustration ne pouvait être plus éloquente. La priorité est de combattre les brutes du califat jusqu’à les faire disparaître, tout en menant un dialogue politique. Un changement de régime ne fait pas partie de la donne.

Poutine en a informé le sultan Erdogan et le roi Salman par téléphone. Puis les ministres des Affaires étrangères de la Russie, des USA, de la Turquie et de l’Arabie saoudite se sont réunis à Vienne vendredi pour discuter de la feuille de route politique. Moscou doit convaincre Riyad que Téhéran doit aussi se retrouver à la table de négociations. C’est l’évidence même, mais essayez de raisonner avec ces penseurs saoudiens. Même John Kerry s’est montré raisonnable pour une fois, en soulignant que tous les pays qui ont un intérêt en Syrie, y compris la Russie et l’Iran, reconnaissent le besoin d’établir une Syrie unifiée, laïque et pluraliste gouvernée avec l’assentiment de sa population.

En extrapolant à partir du discours de Poutine, voilà où nous en sommes en matière de guerre et de paix. Sauf que nous vivons dans un monde de fous, où la guerre c’est la paix, livrés au suspense dans l’attente de ce que nous réserve encore un groupe de wahhabites à l’esprit dérangé.


Traduit par Daniel, relu par jj et Diane pour le Saker francophone.


Pepe Escobar est l’auteur de Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007), Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge (Nimble Books, 2007), Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009) et le petit dernier, Empire of Chaos